Sensaphone steps to improve enterprise network security

Sensaphone if someone asks how many technology is included in the enterprise's network security portfolio, can it be answered correctly? Many IT and security professionals do not respond well to this because they have a variety of security factors. For some enterprises, understanding their own assets should be an important part of its overall security situation, and then it will face the problem of technology spread.

Malware technology and applications are developing every day, and many companies think that investing in this problem is a safe way to reduce risk. They will buy new services or products to deal with the latest threats, and then deploy it, and think that this is a safe way. In view of this common practice, it is not surprising that in the next five years (from 2017 to 2021), the expenditure of global network security products and services is expected to exceed US $1 trillion.
But this security strategy not only wastes money, but also the IT infrastructure is made up of various solutions. These solutions are not designed for common work. In many cases, this will make the foundation of the enterprise loopholes, so that the network criminals can be successfully infiltrated. The fact is, more spending does not always mean reducing the occurrence of violations.
The best way to avoid this vicious circle is to take the initiative to manage its own network security portfolio and put optimization and choreography in the first place. The following are the three steps to help the enterprise begin to implement.
1. eliminate the "waste" of network security tools
It is not hard to understand how many IT environments become a chaotic point solution. Over the years, investment, acquisition and merger have promoted the expansion and spread of technology, and it is urgent to buy the best products constantly, so as to cope with the current advanced threats.
But to buy too many security products, the effect will disappoint the enterprise. Managing the extensive network of the third party suppliers requires a lot of time and resources, the creation of solutions, and the seamless integration of products, which is a difficult task. Some enterprises develop their own internal solutions to connect different systems, but most of which only increase support burdens and prevent them from upgrading or upgrading effectively.
Eliminate unnecessary or unnecessary products and eliminate waste in the portfolio of network security products. This will help companies focus on solutions that have proven commercial value and reduce the number of secure suppliers that must be managed.
2. optimize the existing investment
Since there are some limited security solutions for enterprises to use, the next step is to make sure to make full use of them. The safety products purchased by many enterprises have never been used. In fact, a number of research studies have shown that as many as 30% of the security software purchases have never been deployed. Therefore, the enterprise needs to assess any internal architecture and deploy solutions suitable for the enterprise's overall security strategy.
There are other useful methods to ensure that the enterprise can make full use of the existing security portfolio, including health checks to ensure that the solution to the performance and efficiency of operation of the highest available safety function and check tool, to determine which enterprises can use without the use of function.
3. wise consideration of future security expenditure
Enterprises need to reconsider how to deal with security expenditure. Stop buying and renewing new products to meet the predefined strategy of the enterprise. On the contrary, before buying every new product, carefully weigh the need for the best technology and the importance of building a fully integrated product, service and system security infrastructure. The technology of investment automation tasks and the realization of choreography (arranging these automated tasks) will help to achieve this goal, while enabling IT and security teams to concentrate on dealing with business priorities and high priority businesses.
In order to cope with the attack of today's complex cyber criminals, enterprises must transform their security infrastructure and operation from passive, clumsy and product centered mode to a planned, predictable, optimized mode.
The right to complete the security
Like many things in life, when it comes to network security, investing a lot of money is not the best solution. Buying a lot of safety tools may have opposite effects. There are many reasons for it, including making infrastructure more complex and difficult to manage, prompting staff burnout, and causing Internet criminals to be increasingly good at exploiting loopholes. Nowadays, companies do not need more safety products. They need the right strategy, the right infrastructure, the right policies and processes, and optimize their network security portfolio. This is the first step to achieve this goal.

Sensaphone: do enterprises need a special backup server?

Sensaphone, a typical data protection architecture consists of a server whose only purpose is to receive data from the endpoint. This server is responsible for extracting data from the endpoint or receiving data from the endpoint. It can also perform duplicate data deletions, compress, and update the file and media database. All of these features make the server focus on the task to be the best practice. But the more than 10 - year way of doing things is still the best practice.

In the past ten years, many things have changed. The data center needs a high-end system to manage all the responsibilities on the backup server. In addition, because of the very limited computing power, applications are also specially used for single server to ensure that they get the required performance. Now, most of the middle end servers provide enough power to drive the backup process, and the computing power needed to run applications is also very large. By virtualization, people can now stack multiple applications on each application.
The dedicated backup server also has shortcomings. First, companies have to buy high-end servers to back up the data, and in most cases, this data can only happen once a day. Second, the backup server becomes a bottleneck. Although dozens or even hundreds of systems can send data to them at the same time, all of these data must be merged into a system. The backup server is unusual from the point of view of the network and computing.
Another challenge for a dedicated backup server is the size. What will the organization do if the server runs out of the network or computing resources? It has to be a bigger increase, and the backup server is not uncommon for both the network and the computing point of view.
Direct backup
Those who want to modernize the data center may consider another option, that is, a direct backup to the cloud. A direct backup means that a physical server or even a virtual machine sends the data directly to a backup repository based on cloud computing. Direct transmission to cloud backup eliminates the concern of enterprises on computing and network expansion. When a new server is added, these resources are basically zoomed.
The concern for direct backup is the potential impact on the performance of applications, but in computing resources rich modern data centers, computing power is far less worrying than before. Another problem is management, and the enterprise needs to consider how to manage the backup of all these separate components and how to protect the ownership of protected data.
Solving these problems requires a new cloud computing software architecture that can centrally manage thousands of endpoints and integrate them into a repository. Cloud computing is an ideal choice for such actions. The endpoints can perform their own repeating data deleting and compression, effectively sending the new data segments directly to the cloud. The software hosted by cloud computing is in essence the choreography and management engine of all the endpoints it protects. It should also provide global duplication of data to control the cost of cloud storage.
Considering the amount of protected data, users' expectations of protected data and available computing to drive the process, the classical backup architecture with dedicated backup servers needs to be changed. It is no longer a single dedicated server, and the backup software needs to be more dispersed. One way to achieve this goal is a direct backup, that is, the application server sends the data directly to the backup device or target.